Welcome to ArmyAdvice Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

View from an Army Spouse

Army Steve's Wife, Michelle

One Weekend a Month, Two Weeks a Year

There has, understandably, been a lot of attention in the press given to the National Guard, since large numbers of them are currently deployed to the sandbox.   However, I am beginning to question some of the information which is being presented on this group of soldiers, since I think it may be leading to some misconceptions by the general public.

Two phrases found in nearly all articles about the National Guard are: “(they) drill one weekend a month and two weeks during the summer” and “part-time soldiers.”  Combined, these seem to imply that these men and women lack the necessary training to do the missions required of them (and, coincidentally, are most often found in stories of Guard shortcomings.) And while the implication that one signs up for Guard and, by the second drill weekend is jumping out of airplanes is a little absurd, it is not far from the impression that the general public presently has. 

What these stories fail to discuss is the intense training that each soldier undergoes when learning his or her job in the military.  The same training, in fact, undergone by EVERY soldier, whether they be Active Duty, National Guard, or Reserve.  This training includes Basic Training (where the soldier learns, essentially, how to be a soldier), AIT (where the soldier learns the specialized skills to do his or her job, whether it be as a cook or an engineer or a helicopter pilot), and a myriad of other specialized schools (designed to teach more job and leadership skills).  There is NO difference.  Further blurring the distinction is that many of the soldiers in National Guard have previously served as Active Duty soldiers.  (Officers have a similar but different training track.)

I also find it amusing that so many of the articles discussing these “part-time” soldiers involve those who are presently deployed.  Now, I am not over there, but I think that if you ask anyone who is, you will find that it is very much a full-time job, again with all of the same duties and conditions faced by all military personnel.  (Its not like the Guard guys are taking long weekends off or quitting at 2 pm over there.....)

Little is made of the advantages that National Guard soldiers bring to their military careers.  Many of them have civilian skills which add to their military abilities, both in terms of technical abilities and leadership.  In fact, many of the soldiers have military jobs that parallel their other careers, making them more effective in both roles.  Others work in widely different fields, making them much more versatile and able to look at situations from a different perspective.

In any case, I think too much attention is focused on the differences between the various groups within the military.  The important thing to remember is that whether a soldier is Active Duty, Reserve, or National Guard, they are first and foremost a SOLDIER. 

Published Monday, December 13, 2004 9:27 AM by msmith

Comments

 

msmith said:

Michelle,

While I agree that National Guard personnel are soldiers and recieve equal initial entry training, there is NO question that reinforcement training is nowhere comparable to Active Duty. The professional development training for Guard Sergeants is much shorter that that on AD and Guard/Reserve officers complete only a 2 week advanced course compared with 4-5 months spent by their active duty peers.
I have a friend mobilized with the 42nd Division HQ (NYARNG) and he confirms that the experience level, energy and military competence is generally lacking compared to an Active Duty HQ.
Perhaps we should focus on the image that the National Guard portrays to the American public. Have you visited www.1800goguard.com or the Army Reserve site at www.goarmy.com? These sites are still trying to portray the Guard to enlistees as a "part time" job. The Guard still comes here to campus in NY, while 65% of the NYARNG is deployed, pushing free college and "part time" duty.
The Guard leadership has been so quick to "beat its breast" concerning the historic deployments while their Recruiting force continues to sell the old image to get bodies to enlist. Which is it - the image that we are "equals" to the Active Army or "part time" college kids and citizen-soldiers?
December 13, 2004 11:00 AM
 

msmith said:

while i hesitate to say guard and active duty soldiers are the same, i must say neither have the upper hand. active duty soldiers do tend to have a higher energy level and the famous "hooah" attitude, but that is all too often accompanied with a higher immaturity level as well. most of the active duty guys, and i am not knocking, come right out of high school and only know simply what the army teaches them. i am a college graduate, hold a professional posistion in the civilian world, volunteer emt and fireman and an nco in the army national guard, currently deployed, so yes i think i out "qualify" some active duty nco's, in SOME instances. what you must realize is we, active duty and guard, are two different operating systems, but in the end are all soldiers making the same sacrifices. you know all two well not to put too much validity into what ANY recruiter says.

sgt. billy cipriani
army national guard
December 14, 2004 12:52 AM
 

msmith said:

Bill,

You are correct! The Guard adds a lot to the total Army in experience, maturity and dedication. Many Guard E-4s are paid more and better educated that some AD Majors!

My concern is when the Guard and DoD leadership speak with a "forked tongue." To get the $$$ at the federal trough, guys like LTG Blum (sp?) make it sound like the Guard is just as tactically and technically proficient as the full-timers. At the same time, the Guard tries to sell it as "just another part time job to go to college." The leadership needs to make up its mind - very bipolar.

Gods Speed!
December 14, 2004 2:11 AM
 

msmith said:

I just wanted to comment on the amount of time spent training guard/reserve. My family member is currently with the 278th National Guard unit from Tennessee and while I can't speak about Sergeant training I can tell you that National Guard officers go through the exact training as Active Duty. Some of the guys went active duty while others went National Guard there was no distinction between the two. They trained side by side. They all had the same training. Just thought that might help the guy from NY understand that Guard/Reserves are very well trained.
December 15, 2004 5:40 PM
 

msmith said:

Actually, the Guard saying "One weekend a month, two weeks a year" still holds true. That's *exactly* how long the average Guardsman can expect to be at home in any given year!

Actually, Guard officers and AC officers attend initial entry training (OBC, maybe a follow-on school) together ONLY. After that, a Guard officer may *never* train in an AC school for the rest of their 20 years. There are two separate school systems set up for AC/AGR and traditional M-Day soldiers, and never the twain shall meet sometimes.
December 17, 2004 11:01 AM
 

msmith said:

We all wear the same uniform...we all are subjected to sacrifice...we are all bound and committed to the Army Values and the Warrior Ethos...we all put our pants on the same way...and we all bleed red blood the same. Instead of separating and dividing, focus on unifying...we are all on the same team in the end.

Proud and committed to serving,
MSG Wahl
December 21, 2004 11:25 PM
Anonymous comments are disabled